🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.