🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart atomic talks with Washington as long as it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi said only diplomacy was effective, and disclosed fresh requests had originated from go-betweens to reopen negotiations with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to access struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Navigating a Difficult Course

Araghchi is treading a challenging path since Iran does not want appear to be operating from a stance of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more resilient defensively and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material domestically that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Previous Discussions Unexpectedly Concluded

The earlier sessions of discussions between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that ended with Donald Trump asserting the facilities had been eliminated. Subsequently, EU nations used their privilege to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with American involvement could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could operate inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Officials stated on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the deal to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Status

Iran's diplomats said the consortium offer was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be resurrected in certain ways if negotiations restart.

The American leader recently stated he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to restart talks, but confidentially Iranian officials say they are not yet getting coherent offers from the United States either directly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of passivity in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran states dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his address to the gathering, designed to depict the US as a controlling nation that misuses the concept of international law, Araghchi said the two-week conflict showed the conflict could not be ended by military means. He stated the attacks started with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and ended with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making trust hard to restore.

Diplomacy Stays the Ultimate Answer

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had fled negotiations; it was the United States and the Western nations that had always attempted to dictate their will during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be viable and stays the ultimate solution to resolve conflicts, but its criteria, regulations and tenets must be adhered to."

"In case they speak to the nation of Iran with the approach of respect and honor, they will obtain a response in the same approach."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the struggle of repair and recovery, the foreign minister said he was certain Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We gained multiple understandings from this conflict; we have identified our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He added: "We managed to survive this war. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to obliterate, remains in place. The facilities and equipment, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but failed to break. The Iranian people have developed more resilient, more cohesive, and more backing of the leadership and the state in the aftermath of this attack."