🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear he was able to withstand losing against lower-league opposition. He weathered an important continental showpiece versus a particularly poor Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood losing at home to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, laying waste to the team's best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, calling his team the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to engage. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, like many a Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, Amorim took on the executive and seems to have failed. The most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a coach who often railed at his players for failing in individual battles succumbing in the face of the intense pressure and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this whole painful saga appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been easy, given his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to regard him as merely a functionary within the club's structure: a man whose appointment was due largely to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted manager, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless a previous executive earlier, he has proved himself as one of football's strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which United’s mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

A Strategic Clash Over System and Philosophy

For example, it was the director , after being involved in the hierarchy that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his beloved formation. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. However, these judgements carry more weight when delivered by a man of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a role in a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – men like him – simply operate on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being ready to comprehend it.

The Supreme Authority Behind the Throne

Naturally, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his desire for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to embrace analytics and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be determined in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

A New Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Above Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and energy to go into a club and implement their plan through to completion. But how many companies have such individuals set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the tactics in the boardroom and hire someone who can tailor their offering to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to delivery personnel: not really creating the product, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined while those individuals who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

The Modern Corporate Game: Accountability for the Few

And possibly in a small way this is simply corporate governance at work: the rise of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices remain untouchable, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss them for using too much 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and later bin them for requiring excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.